Silicon Forest

Weather Engineering Chemtrail Conspiracy Theory in Canada

Weather Engineering Chemtrail Conspiracy Theory in Canada

—

by

Aaron Day
in

Canadian government provide disclosure of 71 records since 1985 documenting weather modification activities, primarily hail suppression via cloud seeding in Alberta to protect crops and property from storms.

Alberta’s ongoing Hail Suppression Project, started in 1996 and funded by insurers, deploys aircraft to release silver iodide into clouds, reducing hail damage by an estimated 20-50% based on peer-reviewed studies from the Journal of Weather Modification.

Recent 2024 entries involve experimental lightning suppression using aluminum-coated chaff from drones in wildfire-prone areas, highlighting evolving applications amid climate concerns but raising transparency debates in geoengineering ethics.

  1. Creation of completely new wind directions by induced air depressions.
  2. Dehydration of certain ecosystems through the aluminum oxide.
  3. Charging giant air electric fields leading to more lighting that induced wild fires in dehydrated forests and range land.
  4. Increasing frequency and empowering the natural disasters by seeding air with precipitation nuclei causing floods.
  5. Cooling upper air layers over warm water causing hurricanes, tornadoes, and building heavy snow and hail.
  6. Decreasing air visibility due to suspended chemtrail particles in the air.
  7. Causing health problems with allergic symptoms to chemicals and components of its aerosol.
  8. Creation of extreme killer heat waves when reflecting heat back to earth by aluminum oxide.
  9. Increasing human mortality in proportion to decreased air visibility, and
  10. Increasing risk with calcification diseases caused by the stratospheric Nanobacteria carried down to earth on the chemtrail particles

With regard to the Weather Modification Information Act, broken down by year since 1985, or as far back as records permit: (a) how many times has the government’s administrator been informed of weather modification activities; (b) what are the details of each instance in (a), including, for each, (i) the date and time when, and the place where, the activity was to be carried out, (ii) who carried out the activity, (iii) the purpose of the activity, (iv) the equipment, materials and methods used, (v) the geographic area affected; and (c) how many instances is the government aware of where an individual violated the act, and for each instance, what was the result (warning, fine, etc.)?

Environment and Climate Change Canada

Reply by: the Minister of Environment and Climate Change

Name of Signatory: The Honourable Julie Dabrusin

Reply

Environment and Climate Change Canada

(a) How many times has the government’s administrator been informed of weather modification activities?

Since 1985, the Administrators of the Weather Modification Information Act received approximately 71 separate records (Notices of Intent and Final Reports) of both proposed and executed weather modification activities.

(b) What are the details of each instance in (a), including, for each, (i) the date and time when, and the place where, the activity was to be carried out, (ii) who carried out the activity, (iii) the purpose of the activity, (iv) the equipment, materials and methods used, (v) the geographic area affected?

SAMPLE

(c) How many instances is the government aware of where an individual violated the act, and for each instance, what was the result (warning, fine, etc.)?

The information requested is not systematically tracked or to the level of detail required in Environment and Climate Change Canada’s departmental system. Environment and Climate Change Canada concluded that producing and validating a comprehensive response to this question would require a manual collection of information that is not possible in the time allotted and could lead to the disclosure of incomplete and misleading information. 

Comments

Leave a Reply