Pinu, Għasri, Malta

Violations Against the European Convention on Human Rights

European Convention on Human Rights has Been Violated

On the 24th August, 2021, a group of 95 citizens and residents on The Maltese Islands filed a case in the Civil Court in its constitutional capacity, challenging a number of disproportionate measures taken by the Superintendent of Public Health over the past 18 months, in connection with the handling of SARS COV 2 and Covid 19. They claim that these are unconstitutional and go against the European Convention on Human Rights.

The applicants, who have rallied behind the civil society groups Human Health Alliance and the Natural Health Community for support, have stated that the Superintendent of Public Health persistently failed to heed several warnings or take note of various indications over the past few months, both locally as well as internationally, that clearly showed that the curtailment of a number of fundamental rights and basic civil liberties was not justifiable, reasonable, necessary or proportionate.

Subsequently, they are claiming, a number of measures taken by means of legal notices throughout 2020 and 2021 are in breach of their rights. These include their fundamental rights to freedom of movement within and beyond the Maltese Islands, their freedom to congregate, including in their churches, their right to privacy and family life, their right not to be forced to cover their faces in public, their right to breath fresh air when in the open, their right not to be discriminated against on the basis of their medical choices, their right not to be treated as sick when they enjoy good health, and their right not to be forced into isolation or quarantine in the absence of being clearly and properly diagnosed and certified to be sick and a health risk to others.

Further reading below;

Warning to Medical Professionals

I’m not anti-vaccine. I’m anti-stupid.

“If you’re injecting someone with these drug vaccine biologics, you are injecting them with something that you cannot possibly give them informed consent for, which means you’re violating your Hippocratic Oath, you’re violating the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Treaty, you’re violating the Nuremberg Code, you’re violating the Declaration of Helsinki.

Hippocrates. Line engraving, 1584.

For me, as a researcher, obviously, once I start to investigate something, the only way you can stop me from doing that is to put a bullet in my head. Otherwise, I’m going to stay after it. There are things that are not in the book that are going to come out in international criminal court, things I’m saving for that, because this virus is, by definition, a biological weapon.

It violates the biological weapons convention treaty. You just have to look at the definitions. It provides nothing useful to humanity. It’s dangerous. When Fort Detrick is involved and the Department of Defense is involved … and you see these monies and you see the people that are involved, you realize that … the United States was playing China, China was playing the United States, and you saw who got caught in between. And they’re still playing the game.

For lack of a better term, this book is an indictment. That’s now my attorney hat going on saying that I have provided in this book evidence that I would take to a grand jury … I’m not somebody who is going to give up on having these people dealt with, because all the freedoms that we have lost, and the rights that we have lost as individuals, not to mention just the numbers of people who have died.

My argument is … the reason why they died is because they didn’t get treatment for the inflammation and the blood clotting that I and other doctors have shown works. The ultimate argument is that you can’t kill somebody more than dead … they can’t do worse than kill the patient. And we’ve already seen what doing nothing does. It kills the patient.

At no other time in American history have doctors looked at patients and said, ‘We can’t do anything for you. Go home and come back when you get sicker.’ We have always treated people with breathing problems with medications for breathing problems. We’ve always treated people with clotting problems with medicines to stop the clotting.

And so, the reason why this is so critical to understand is because the same people who were involved in the funding of this bioweapon are the same people who have interfered with doctors providing treatment to patients, and the same people who have been involved in the development of these vaccines.”

While Fleming carefully lays out the evidence in his book, he leaves it up to you, the reader, to decide whether SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon or not. However, he says, if you do come to that conclusion (and he believes you will once you’ve seen the evidence), “then you have to recognize that the vaccines are nothing more than the genetic reproduction of that bioweapon.” Hence, the COVID shots are bioweapons too.
Warning to Medical Professionals

Source: Before it’s News

Pinu, Għasri, Malta Photo by Ilya Ponomarev on Unsplash Hippocrates. Line engraving, 1584 – comes from Wellcome Images, a website operated by Wellcome Trust, a global charitable foundation based in the United Kingdom. Refer to Wellcome blog post (archive).
This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing.