An official new study out of Japan has concluded that all Covid variants were engineered in biolabs and intentionally released into the public.
The mainstream media has recently ramped up reports that Covid cases are on the rise in the run-up to the 2024 election.
Mainstream journalists and health officials have been promoting the return of masks and vaccines to tackle the spread of new variants EG.5.1 and BA.X.
However, a recent Japanese study suggests that the plot to lockdown the public again may be part of a sinister plan to take away more of our personal freedoms.
NN reports: The study found that all previous variants of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, were not naturally occurring but were, in fact, made in a laboratory.
Presumably, the latest EG.5.1 and BA.X variants were also engineered in a lab, according to the study.
The study was led by renowned Japanese Professors Atsuki Tanaka and Takayuki Miyazawa of Osaka Medical University and Kyoto University.
Tanaka and Miyazawa wanted to trace the historical evolution of the omicron variant of SARS-CoV2.
To trace the variant’s origins, they studied viral sequences found “in the wild” and deposited in public databases.
In doing this they found around 100 separate omicron subvariants that could not conceivably have arisen through natural processes.
The existence of these variants seems to provide definitive proof of large-scale lab creation and release of COVID-19 viruses.
Moreover, the variants appear to form comprehensive panels of mutations typical of those used in “reverse genetics” experiments to systematically test the properties of different parts of viruses, Substacker PSMI wrote.
According to the professors’ findings, COVID-19 and all of its variants came from a lab.
“Suppose the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its one amino acid reversion mutants were artificially and systematically generated,” they further clarify.
“In that case, we should suspect that the other variants (Alpha to Delta) may also be artificially generated viruses.”
They continue by raising questions about who may have engineered the virus and why.
“One idea, the hypothesis that these viruses were artificially generated, is more reasonable than proposing a novel mutation acquisition mechanism,” the paper reads.
“However, is there any reason to artificially create these mutants, which are unlikely to have occurred naturally, given the current SARS-CoV-2 epidemic?”